A ruling was made in the case of Jerry Hicks, Jr. on Friday, September 6, 2024, almost one year after the Stand Your Ground hearing that was held on October 12, 2023. Hicks was arrested and charged with the April 7, 2023 shooting death of Aaron Morris Nix at a local Scottsboro restaurant.<\/p>\n
During the October 2023 hearing, testimony began with Dr. Valerie Green, State Medical Examiner with the Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences. Green testified that the deceased had a gunshot wound which entered his upper chest and exited in his back on the right side. Green testified that the deceased also had blunt force injuries to his left face, ear, eye and both hands, which were consistent with a fall onto pavement. The gunshot wound, according to Green, was consistent with a shot from a downward position, traveling left to right and front to back. At the time of his death, Nix was approximately 178 lbs. The cause of death was determined to be the gunshot wound.<\/p>\n
Scottsboro Police Department Detective Lieutenant Scott Hamilton was the investigator on call the night of the shooting. Hamilton identified photos of the vehicle being driven by Hicks, as well as the vehicle Nix was riding in as a passenger prior to the incident \u2013 one parking space between the vehicles was left vacant, as well as photos of a pocket knife lying beside the deceased\u2019s body, and a meal receipt for the meal Hicks had with his family that evening, with a time stamp of 8:45 p.m. When asked by Graham, Hamilton confirmed the pocket knife discovered beside the deceased was closed.<\/p>\n
Scottsboro Police Sergeant Andrew Miller testified that when the call came in to 911 from the restaurant, he along with three other officers answered the call. Miller testified that he was the third car in a line of four total patrol cars to arrive on scene. Miller stated that he drove to the side of the restaurant where he viewed the deceased lying on the ground, with his head lying on his sister\u2019s knee. There was a closed pocket knife on the deceased\u2019s left side.<\/p>\n
Scottsboro Police Officer Bailey Johnson stated that she was the first officer on the scene. Johnson testified that the Defendant\u2019s gun was on top of his vehicle. Johnson stated that the Defendant was ordered and complied with her commands to get on his knees, place his hands in the air and turn around. He was then placed into handcuffs. Johnson stated that the Defendant began telling her that Nix had yelled at him for letting his child go to the bathroom alone. She testified that she then advised the Defendant of his Miranda Rights and had to explain to him on multiple occasions to stop talking. The Defendant never told Johnson that the deceased had a weapon; she did not see any injuries on the Defendant and that the Defendant never stated he was threatened. The Defendant asked for a lawyer, after telling her that the deceased had hit him.<\/p>\n
The Defense then called Defendant Hicks to the stand. Graham thoroughly covered the Defendant\u2019s right to remain silent, waiver of rights and the fact that his testimony could be used against him in trial, if the case goes to trial.<\/p>\n
Hicks testified that he grew up in Flat Rock. He graduated from Pisgah High School in 2016 and then began the welding program at Northeast Alabama Community College. Hicks stated that he then joined the United States Army. He was stationed in Fort Stewart, Georgia, where he was a heavy equipment operator. Hicks was honorably discharged four years later, when he completed his term. Hicks testified that he then went into the fiber optic industry and was employed by GTS of Georgia, where he worked in Virginia until December 2022. Hicks then began Hicks Contracting, LLC, a fiber optic recruiting service that would provide fiber optic workers for contracts in Washington, Mississippi and Florida. Hicks testified that he and his wife Courtney Sampley live in Scottsboro with their two children, who were six years old and two years old at the time of the shooting. Hicks stated that he had just accepted a job offer with TAC Communications as a recruiter and was supposed to leave for the job the Monday following the shooting. Hicks went on to testify about the day of the shooting.<\/p>\n
Hicks stated on that day, he had helped his sister and brother-in-law move a pool table, went home, finished packing and then he, his wife and his son traveled to the restaurant for dinner. Not long after they arrived, the Defendant stated that his son needed to go to the restroom, so he took him. Following dinner and dessert, the child asked to go back to the restroom and was allowed to go alone, since no one was around. The Defendant testified that the deceased came out of the restroom saying, \u201cWho let\u2019s their f****** kids go to the bathroom by their self.\u201d The Defendant stated that he responded to the deceased, \u201cHey man what\u2019s going on?\u201d The deceased did not respond and continued walking.<\/p>\n
After the Defendant\u2019s child came out of the restroom the family went to the counter to pay for their meal. There the Defendant viewed the deceased standing talking loudly into the kitchen area of the restaurant. Hicks stated that his wife and child exited the building and went to their car to wait for him. Hicks stated that the deceased walked out and to the left and Hicks walked out and to the right, although his car was to the left. Hicks stated that the deceased walked towards his car, and he asked him, \u201cHey man, why are you coming to my car?\u201d Hicks testified that the deceased responded to him saying, \u201cI\u2019ll do whatever the **** I want.\u201d The deceased, according to Hicks, then mentioned that he had let his kid go to the restroom alone and then again stated that he had four children and would not let his kids go to the restroom alone. Hicks testified that he responded, \u201cI let my f****** kid go to the bathroom by himself.\u201d At that time, according to Hicks, the deceased chest bumped him three to four times. Hicks stated that he told the deceased to go to his vehicle and leave him alone. Hicks testified that he was then hit three times by the deceased and stumbled to the trunk of the car. He stated that he then told the deceased that he had a gun and to go on and leave him alone. Hicks testified that he couldn\u2019t get into his car because he would have had to turn his back on the deceased. Hicks testified that the deceased\u2019s sister, who was in the car next to them, kept telling the deceased to quit and leave him alone and that he (Hicks) had a gun. Hicks stated he heard the deceased state, \u201cI\u2019ll end him quicker,\u201d and viewed the deceased reaching into his waistband at which time Hicks states he pulled his gun, aimed full mass and fired. Hicks testified that the deceased then turned and ran.<\/p>\n
Hicks stated he put his weapon on safety, placed it back into his holster and went inside the restaurant. The Defense played the 911 call that was made from the restaurant. The call began with an employee of the restaurant stating that he thought someone outside got shot. Hicks then got on the phone and stated, \u201cHe started punching me and I shot him. When we got to the parking lot, I asked him why he was cussing at my kid.\u201d Hicks went on to testify that he thought the deceased was going to kill him and that he shot so he\u2019d stop and go on.<\/p>\n
A recording of a 911 call made by Hicks was also played. The Defendant can be heard on the call stating that he shot somebody at the Mexican restaurant. \u201cPlease get here quick, he\u2019s dying. He started hitting me, beating me in front of my kid,\u201d Hicks can be heard telling the operator.<\/p>\n
On cross examination, Jackson County District Attorney Jason Pierce asked Hicks where he had gotten the gun. Hicks stated that after leaving the military, although he\u2019d never received any sort of pistol training, and didn\u2019t grow up with guns in his home, his dad had given him the gun. Hicks stated that he had only shot the gun in his yard and only shot three rounds from the gun, upon receiving it from his father. Pierce questioned Hicks about where his confidence to carry came from. Hicks responded, \u201cIt\u2019s my right as a United States citizen to open carry.\u201d Hicks further stated he learned gun safety from a rifle and that he open carries with the safety on and one chambered. Hicks stated that he doesn\u2019t know how many rounds the magazine will hold and that it was loaded one week prior, after losing the magazine.<\/p>\n
Hicks testified on cross examination that he aimed center mass to \u201cGet him to go on and stop.\u201d Hicks also stated that the deceased was six to seven feet away at the time of the shooting. He testified that he pulled the gun with the intent to pull the trigger, that he never saw the knife, that he carries to protect himself and his family, that he became afraid when the deceased approached his vehicle, and that the 911 call was inaccurate when he stated he didn\u2019t mean to shoot him. Hicks also agreed that in the 911 call he states that he had asked the deceased why he was cussing about his kid. Hicks explained to Pierce that when the deceased reached for his waistband he did so with both hands. Hicks stated when they were exiting the building, he wasn\u2019t paying attention to Nix at all. Hicks described those punches he received from Nix as stunning.<\/p>\n
On redirect, Defense Attorney Parker Edmiston questioned Hicks regarding firearms. Hicks testified that his entire family carries. He also testified at the time, he did not feel capable of defending himself hand to hand.<\/p>\n
On recross, Hicks testified that he did learn hand to hand combat in the military. He also testified that he didn\u2019t shoot again because the deceased ran away.<\/p>\n
The deceased\u2019s sister, Valerie Snodgrass was called to the stand following a lunch recess. Snodgrass testified that she, her boyfriend and her brother went to the restaurant that evening between 9:17 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. to pick up her daughter, who was employed at the restaurant. Snodgrass\u2019 testimony began with the statement she had given to Miller. The statement says that her brother told her he needed to use the bathroom and she told him to go inside. She states that the Defendant came out and the deceased came out 10 seconds later. She says she viewed Hicks and Nix talking closely, when it became obvious that the conversation wasn\u2019t friendly, Snodgrass\u2019 statement says that she exited her car to get her brother. Her statement says that the Defendant stated to the deceased, \u201cN***** back the **** up or I\u2019ll f****** kill you.\u201d She says at that point, the deceased punched Hicks. Snodgrass stated that she told Nix that Hicks had a gun. Hicks then shot Nix from approximately two to three feet away and the deceased took off running. Snodgrass\u2019 statement says that the Defendant shot two more times.<\/p>\n
Snodgrass testified that the Defendant yelled at her, \u201cYeah, I f****** shot him.\u201d She also testified that the Defendant warned the deceased several times to \u201cshut up and quit and to back up or he would kill him.\u201d<\/p>\n
Snodgrass stated that she ran into the restaurant to get a light because the parking lot was dark. She says she then ran out the back door where she found Nix facedown, gargling. Snodgrass testified that she rolled Nix over onto his back and laid his head on her legs. On the stand, Snodgrass testified that she saw the Defendants weapon in his waistband, above his holster, not in the holster. She testified that the Defendant came out and the deceased came out approximately three minutes later. Snodgrass also testified that she heard the Defendant say to her brother, \u201cTalk that **** now mother ******.\u201d<\/p>\n
Snodgrass testified that once she exited her car, she got the deceased\u2019s attention and he pivoted, to turn and come to her car, when the Defendant yelled at the deceased again, \u201cThat\u2019s what I thought you f****** n*****,\u201d and that\u2019s when the defendant was hit by the deceased.<\/p>\n
On cross examination by Edmiston, Snodgrass testified that she was very close to her brother. She testified that she had only seen her brother drink two Mike\u2019s Hard Lemonades that day. She did not believe Nix was intoxicated. Edmiston questioned the discrepancies about the time between the Defendant exiting the restaurant and the deceased exiting the restaurant in her statement and in her testimony.<\/p>\n
Miller was called back to the stand by Edmiston to rebut the testimony of Snodgrass. Miller stated that when taking Snodgrass\u2019 statement, she stated the Defendant came out of the restaurant and the deceased came out about ten seconds later. Miller also stated that Snodgrass did report that the Defendant told the deceased multiple times to quit touching him and to back up or he\u2019d kill him.<\/p>\n
Judge Graham took the matter under advisement after the hearing concluded. Graham entered a 37-page order on September 6, 2024 granting the Defendant\u2019s Motion to Dismiss the indictment. <\/p>\n
The order states, in part, \u201cIn describing the rapidly-developing and changing situation, the Defendant stated these things regarding his own state of mind as to why he shot Mr. Nix: I thought he was going to kill me, I had seconds; I didn\u2019t mean to kill him; My intent was for him to go on and stop; He hit me in front of my kid; He started hitting me; He threatened to kill me and he went for something and I didn\u2019t know what weapon he had; He had already assaulted me; I was scared not only for my life, but my wife and son\u2019s as well; It was a dark parking lot; Just me and him alone; Considering my wife and my kid, any grown man would be scared at the moment; I was afraid.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Order went on to state, \u201cMost striking and impressive to this Judge as to why he \u201cjust didn\u2019t get into his car and leave\u201d was the Defendant\u2019s answer that he …\u201dwould not turn my back on him to get into car\u201d and that \u201cI would not open the car and unsecure a secure environment.\u201d This answer makes sense to the court; it was a cautious and reasonable decision by the Defendant under the facts and circumstances testified to in court – not to mention this action is compliant with Alabama law.\u201d<\/p>\n
After quoting testimony of Valerie Snodgrass, a State witness and sister of the deceased, the order stated, \u201cThe Defendant was not in a fight with a \u201cregular\u201d person, but was unwittingly pitted against a \u201cvery physically fit\u201d Boxer, who was \u201cstrong\u201d, who enjoyed boxing, who \u201chit the heavy bag,\u201d who \u201cknows how to throw a punch\u201d. \u201cIt\u2019s obvious to the court that not only was Mr. Nix the initial aggressor, but that he escalated his attacks on the Defendant throughout the encounter. Mr. Nix ignored multiple warnings from his sister to get away from the Defendant, and ignored the warnings from the Defendant himself.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Order then quoted the recent case of Ex Parte Johnson (—So.3d—Ala., 2023 WL 8658886) which states, \u201cAlabama law generally allows a person to use deadly physical force against a another to defend himself or a third person when he \u201creasonably believes\u201d that the other person is \u201cusing or about to use unlawful deadly physical force.\u201d \u00a713A-3-23(a) (1). But there are some important exceptions to that rule. As relevant here, a person is not justified in using physical force to defend himself or a third party if \u201cHe or she was the initial aggressor except that his or her use of physical force upon another person under the circumstances is justifiable if he or she withdrew from the encounter and effectively communicated to the other person his or her intent to do so, but the latter person nevertheless continues or threatens the use of unlawful physical force.\u201d \u201cHere, it is unequivocal and uncontroverted that the Defendant was not the initial aggressor, nor did he become an aggressor during the confrontation. Mr. Nix, however, aggressively and brutally attacked the Defendant. The Defendant was never the aggressor in any sense of that word, until he fired a single shot to defend his own life and the lives of his family members. He was fully justified in doing so.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Order ended by stating that \u201c…the defendant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that force, including deadly force, was justified…\u201d and, therefore, this court must \u201c…enter an order finding the defendant immune from criminal prosecution and dismissing the criminal charges.\u201d<\/p>\n
Attorney Parker Edmiston stated in response to the Order, \u201cI will continue to fight for those who are clearly innocent. In Alabama those who defend themselves and their families have to go through the financial burden of the arrest and bond process and hiring an attorney, all while waiting almost eighteen months for the stand your ground hearing to be held and an Order to be entered. This causes a substantial burden financially, emotionally and socially on those who chose to defend themselves from dangerous situations such as the one my client, Jerry Hicks, Jr. was in.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jackson County District Attorney Jason Pierce said, \u201cWhile we are disappointed in the ruling, we respect the decision of the Court.\u201d<\/p>\n